ISSN (O): 3107-9725Frequency: QuarterlyLanguages: English, Hindi and other languagesDOI Prefix: 10.64127
RNIMJ logoResearchNext International Multidisciplinary JournalInternational Open Access, Peer-reviewed & Refereed JournalISSN: 3107-9725 (Online)DOI Prefix: 10.64127

Official DOI landing page

Structural Hurdles in Grassroots Administration: A Study of Conflict Resolution and Male Dominance Faced by Elected Women in Chamba’s PRIs

Kewal KrishanCorresponding Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science Government P.G. College Chamba Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla

JournalRNIMJ
Volume / Issue2 / 3
Pages75–86
Published05 Jul 2026
Paper IDRNIMJ23JS260011
Views / Downloads12 / 4

Article summary

Abstract

This study examines the structural, administrative, and socio-cultural impediments
encountered by Elected Women Representatives (EWRs) within the Panchayati Raj
Institutions (PRIs) of Chamba district, Himachal Pradesh. Utilizing an empirical
primary data-driven framework, the research investigates how institutionalized male
dominance and entrenched patriarchal norms circumscribe the administrative and
dispute-mediation autonomy of women at the grassroots level. Fieldwork was executed
across two distinct administrative blocks in Chamba: Pangi (a remote, high-altitude
tribal block) focusing on Dharwas and Luj Gram Panchayats; and Bharmaur block,
focusing on Ulansa and Nayagram Gram Panchayats. Primary data was gathered on
site using structured interview schedules, focus group discussions (FGDs), and localized
case studies of active female representatives and community stakeholders.
The paper specifically evaluates the dual pressures of administrative gatekeeping
and the pervasive phenomenon of proxy politics (the Sarpanch Pati culture) within
these specific mountainous topographies. Special analytical focus is directed toward
the efficacy of EWRs in local conflict resolution, encompassing disputes over natural
resource allocation, community land boundaries, and domestic grievances. The
empirical findings reveal a stark divergence between formal constitutional
empowerment and substantive administrative authority. While state PRI mandates
have successfully guaranteed numerical representation, qualitative entry barriers
persist. Female leaders across both blocks routinely confront non-cooperation from male
bureaucrats, domestic gatekeeping, and a systemic deficit in community acceptance
during dispute mediation, where traditional male authority figures continue to be
favored. Consequently, conflicts are frequently hijacked or mediated through male
proxies, undermining the statutory power vested in elected women. Conversely,
comparative field insights highlight emerging narratives of leadership resilience—
particularly within Pangi’s geographically isolated terrain—where targeted capacity
building mitigates initial vulnerabilities.

Keywords

Elected Women Representatives (EWRs)Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs)Women’s Political EmpowermentPatriarchy and Male DominanceProxy Politics and Sarpanch Pati CultureAdministrative Barriers and Dispute ResolutionChamba DistrictHimachal Pradesh

Citation record

How to cite this article

Kewal Krishan (2026). Structural Hurdles in Grassroots Administration: A Study of Conflict Resolution and Male Dominance Faced by Elected Women in Chamba’s PRIs. ResearchNext International Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(3), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.64127/rnimj.2026v2i30011

Kewal Krishan. “Structural Hurdles in Grassroots Administration: A Study of Conflict Resolution and Male Dominance Faced by Elected Women in Chamba’s PRIs.” ResearchNext International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, 2026, pp. 75–86. https://doi.org/10.64127/rnimj.2026v2i30011

Kewal Krishan. “Structural Hurdles in Grassroots Administration: A Study of Conflict Resolution and Male Dominance Faced by Elected Women in Chamba’s PRIs.” ResearchNext International Multidisciplinary Journal 2, no. 3 (2026): 75–86. https://doi.org/10.64127/rnimj.2026v2i30011

Kewal Krishan (2026) ‘Structural Hurdles in Grassroots Administration: A Study of Conflict Resolution and Male Dominance Faced by Elected Women in Chamba’s PRIs’, ResearchNext International Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(3), pp. 75–86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.64127/rnimj.2026v2i30011.

Kewal Krishan, “Structural Hurdles in Grassroots Administration: A Study of Conflict Resolution and Male Dominance Faced by Elected Women in Chamba’s PRIs,” ResearchNext International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 75–86, 2026. https://doi.org/10.64127/rnimj.2026v2i30011.

Kewal Krishan. Structural Hurdles in Grassroots Administration: A Study of Conflict Resolution and Male Dominance Faced by Elected Women in Chamba’s PRIs. ResearchNext International Multidisciplinary Journal. 2026;2(3):75–86. https://doi.org/10.64127/rnimj.2026v2i30011.

Kewal Krishan. Structural Hurdles in Grassroots Administration: A Study of Conflict Resolution and Male Dominance Faced by Elected Women in Chamba’s PRIs. ResearchNext International Multidisciplinary Journal 2026, 2 (3), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.64127/rnimj.2026v2i30011.

Record provenance

Publication history

Received22 Apr 2026
Accepted26 Jun 2026
Published05 Jul 2026
DOI assigned26 Oct 2026
Record versionVersion of Record

Research integrity

Declarations

Funding

The author(s) declare that no specific funding was received for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this work.

Ethical Approval

The author(s) declare that ethical approval was not applicable to this work.

Data Availability

The author(s) declare that data sharing is not applicable, as no datasets were generated or analysed for this work.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception, research, preparation, review and final approval of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for the accuracy and integrity of the work.

AI-use Declaration

AI tools were used only for language editing. The author(s) reviewed and verified the final content and remain responsible for its accuracy and integrity.

Editorial record

Publisher's Note

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The views, content, and claims expressed in this article are solely the responsibility of the author(s). The publisher and editors accept no legal liability for any errors, copyright infringement, or loss or damage arising from its use.

Open-access terms

License & Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Author(s). This work is published by ResearchNext International Multidisciplinary Journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.

Discover more

Related articles