Jayaprakash Narayan’s Thought and Its Contemporary Relevance for Combating Political Corruption
Dr. Rajeev Sagar, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, UP.
Published Date: 25 September 2025
Issue: Vol. 1 ★ Issue 1 ★ July - September 2025
Published Paper PDF: Click here

Abstract:

This paper offers a critical analysis of Jayaprakash Narayan’s (JP) anti-corruption philosophy and its contemporary relevance. Its central claim is that JP’s call for “Total Revolution”—anchored in moral renewal, democratic participation, and institutional reform— constitutes a durable framework that remains effective today. First, the moral–spiritual foundation: JP treats politics as service, not power; he locates the roots of political corruption in the erosion of character, integrity, and civic responsibility. Second, public participation: he views peaceful, broad-based social movements and citizen awareness as essential pressure mechanisms for responsive governance, enabling transparency and accountability across electoral, party, and policy processes. Third, institutional reform: independent oversight bodies, an empowered ombudsman, penalty-backed enforcement, transparent political finance, and an impartial civil service are outlined as structural remedies. Historically situated interventions—Total Revolution, the Bihar Movement, and resistance to the Emergency— are read alongside present cases to show that despite technological advances, vested interests, weak enforcement, and the criminalization of politics continue to obstruct control of corruption. The paper concludes that JP’s approach prioritizes the fusion of ethical leadership development, grassroots mobilization, and rule-bound institutional architecture; this combination provides a practical roadmap against contemporary challenges—illicit finance, policy capture, and regulatory rent-seeking—and travels well to democracies across the Hindi belt and the broader Global South.

Keywords: Jayaprakash Narayan; Total Revolution; political corruption; ethical leadership; mass movements; institutional reform; governance accountability.